This is Tianjin Bozhuan Law Firm, welcome to our official website!

022-59189901;(+86)13920701735

Your current location:Home - Our team - Lawyer introduction

OUT TEAM

Lawyer Wang Ronggui

Lawyer Wang Ronggui, deputy director, founding partner and contract business department of Tianjin Bo Law Firm, graduated from the Law Department of Hebei University School of Political Science and Law. During the university, he passed the national judicial examination with an excellent score of 417 points. Wang Ronggui is a regular law subject. He has a profound legal theory and a strong ability to apply legal provisions. He has high attainments in civil and commercial laws such as contract law, property law and company law. He has a comprehensive quality of criminal law and administrative law. He has a unique law. The way of thinking is good at grasping the key entry points of complicated legal relations.

Lawyer Wang Ronggui has handled hundreds of lawsuits and non-litigation cases since his practice, and many cases have been in Tianjin Daily, Daily News, City Express, City Express, Tonight, Tianjin Workers. Newspaper and other media reports. Mr. Wang Ronggui has been a guest of the "Traditional Help Group" section of the Tianjin Radio Station traffic channel. He has been questioning and answering questions for the audience. He was invited by the Tianjin Human Resources and Social Security Bureau to teach the city's labor relations coordinator. . Lawyer Wang Ronggui has long participated in the legal service activities of Tianjin Federation of Trade Unions and Jinghai District Federation of Trade Unions, and has been well received and recognized by the staff and enterprises.

Mr. Wang Ronggui has a wealth of experience in handling cases, and can plan a variety of litigation plans and non-litigation plans for the client to choose according to the specific circumstances of the case, which is highly praised by the client.

Practice philosophy: aiming to help the client to fulfill the law's commitment to citizens, there is a glimmer of hope and a hundredfold effort.

Areas of expertise: labor disputes, contract business, intellectual property business, corporate business, infringement, real estate and engineering, administrative litigation, criminal defense, etc.

Successful cases (for some reasons, only select some classic cases):

First, the contract business

1. Plaintiff Miao and the defendant Beijing Immigration Service Co., Ltd. immigration service contract dispute, the lawyer represented the plaintiff, in the case that the service contract of the two parties did not clearly stipulate the purpose of the service, the public notice of the defendant company was used to publicize the defendant company's official website to determine the purpose of the contract. , the cancellation of the contract to return all service fees, all requests for support are supported (this case is)

2. The defendant’s financial leasing company and the defendant Xiao Moumou’s financial leasing contract dispute, the lawyer represented the defendant, and forced the plaintiff to initiate reconciliation and withdraw the case by exercising the procedural rights such as jurisdictional objection and preservation of dissent.

3. The plaintiff Shanghai company and the defendant Tianjin Chemical Co., Ltd. and the sales contract dispute, the lawyer represented the defendant, and exercised the right of jurisdiction to dissent before the court, forcing the plaintiff to withdraw the lawsuit and waive the prosecution of the defendant.

4. The Plaintiff Metal Products Co., Ltd. and the defendant Tianjin Bicycle Accessories Co., Ltd. settled the contract dispute. The lawyer represented the defendant and forced the plaintiff to take the initiative to mediate with the defendant by filing a counterclaim.

5. The plaintiff Tianjin Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. and the defendant Tianjin Life Supermarket Co., Ltd. sold the contract dispute, the lawyer represented the plaintiff, in the case that the supply contract of the two parties stipulated unreasonable deduction and the statement was confirmed by the plaintiff, the plaintiff claimed the deserved All payment requests are supported.

6. The plaintiff, a cultural media company and a defendant group company, commissioned a contract dispute, and the lawyer represented the plaintiff. In the case of conflict between the factual performance and the contractual agreement between the two parties, the plaintiff claimed that the factual parties changed the contract and obtained court support. Entrusted compensation claims are fully supported.

Second, the company's business business

In the case of the plaintiff Liu Moumou and the defendant’s shareholder qualification confirmation dispute, the lawyer represented the plaintiff and proved that the plaintiff was the actual funder, the actual operation manager and the actual profit enjoyr, and finally confirmed the plaintiff’s shareholder qualification.

Third, the infringement business

1. The plaintiff Song Moumou and the defendant A Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Tianjin Branch, the defendant Wang, a motor vehicle traffic accident liability dispute, the lawyer acting as the defendant Wang Moumou, in the case of the driver’s escape in accordance with the insurance contract, the insurance company is exempt from liability. The lawyer claimed that the insurance company did not fulfill the obligation of reminding the exemption clause, so that the defendant Wang Moumou, who is the bidder, could not be effective. The court’s disclaimer clause does not take effect on the bidder’s defendant Wang, and should bear the insurance limit. Liability for the defendant reduced direct economic losses by several hundred thousand yuan.

2. The plaintiff Wang Moumou and the defendant Du Moumou, a property insurance company Tianjin Branch, the motor vehicle traffic accident liability dispute, the lawyer acting as the plaintiff, in the case of the plaintiff has reached the retirement age, and non-urban residence, the claim for lost time And the calculation of disability compensation according to urban standards is supported.

3. Re-examination of the applicant Zhang and the respondent Yang's motor vehicle traffic accident liability dispute, the lawyer's agent re-applicants, claiming that the first-instance and second-instance judgments on the re-examination of the applicant's hanging bed treatment were wrong, and finally the higher people's court ruled the retrial.

Fourth, labor disputes

1. Re-examination of the applicant and a respondent of a switch company in violation of the law to terminate the labor dispute, the lawyer re-applied the applicant, the first, second and retrial, the applicant has received the notice of termination of the labor contract has been received In the case of the case, the procuratorial organ applied for a protest on the grounds that the notice of cancellation was not received. Finally, the Municipal People's Procuratorate filed a protest with the High People's Court, and the High Court re-examined the trial, and finally the two parties mediate, and the respondent compensated the applicant for economic losses.

2. Arbitration applicant Wu Mou and the respondent A Compressor Co., Ltd. economic compensation labor dispute dispute, lawyer agent applicant, the company's business address trans-provincial transfer of the two sides of the labor contract basis has undergone major changes and the two parties can not agree on the performance of the labor contract Under the circumstances, the company did not take the initiative to terminate the labor contract. The lawyer recommended that the applicant Wu Mou preemptively filed a labor contract on the grounds that the unit failed to provide labor conditions in accordance with the labor contract, and claimed economic compensation, and was supported by the labor dispute arbitration committee.

3. Arbitration applicant Zhang and the respondent A pharmaceutical company's labor injury treatment labor dispute, in addition to the work injury insurance regulations specified in the Work Injury Insurance Regulations, the lawyer's agent claims that the nutrition fee and the work stoppage period expires The pre-disability wages were all supported by the Labor Dispute Arbitration Commission.

5. Real estate and engineering business

1. The plaintiff Wang and the defendant of a property management company construction project contract dispute, the lawyer represented the plaintiff, in the case where the plaintiff Wang Mou’s whereabouts of the unit is unknown and cannot claim the project payment, the lawyer suggested that the plaintiff directly sued the claim in the name of the actual construction person. The project payment was approved by the court, and the defendant company took the initiative to clear all the construction funds in one lump sum.

2. The plaintiff's construction engineering company and the defendant's construction project bidding dispute, the lawyer acting as the plaintiff, in the case of the defendant charging an excessive bid bond in accordance with the normative documents of a military region, the lawyer claims that the bidding law should be applied. The Implementation Regulations stipulate the criteria for judging the bid bond, and finally obtain the support of the court, and decide that the defendant will refund the bid bond received and compensate the interest loss.

3. The plaintiff’s real estate development company’s commercial house and the defendant Li’s contract of sale and purchase, the lawyer represented the defendant. In the case that the loan cannot be approved due to the defendant’s personal reasons and the house payment cannot be made according to the agreement, the defendant shall bear the total house according to the contract. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff developer had no actual losses due to the significant increase in the value of the real estate market. According to the principle of profit and loss, the defendant only agreed to deduct the 20,000 yuan deposit as compensation. Agree with the defendant's opinion and the two parties settled the contract.

4. The case of the plaintiff Xie Mou and the defendant Jiang’s house sale contract dispute, the lawyer represented the plaintiff, and the defendant refused to continue to perform the contract on the grounds of price increase after signing the real estate transaction contract. The plaintiff sued for continued performance and timely passed the property after filing the case. The security method checks and seals the registered property files involved in the case, restricts the transfer, actively prepares the house payment in the lawsuit, does not prepare for the loan, and removes all obstacles to implementation. Finally, the two parties mediate the defendant to agree to assist in the performance of the contract and assist in the transfer of the real estate.

5. The dispute between the plaintiff Li and the defendant Yang’s house sale contract, the defendant refused to continue to perform the contract on the grounds of price increase after signing the real estate transaction contract. The lawyer represented the plaintiff to terminate the contract and compensate the house for the difference in price difference, and listed the defendant’s In all kinds of faults and breaches, the court finally supported 80% of the house price difference.

6. The plaintiff Zhao and the defendant Chen’s house sales contract dispute, the plaintiff sued for compensation for the difference in price, the lawyer acting as the seller’s defendant Chen, the lawyer filed the defendant Chen’s fault to a lesser extent, and finally the court’s decision only supported the compensation for the difference. Fifty points.

7. The plaintiff Wang and the defendant Zhang’s property rights confirmed the dispute. The lawyer represented the plaintiff. In the case that the property rights of the house actually purchased and actually occupied by Wang were registered and transferred to Zhang by two transfers, the lawyer grasped twice. The transferred transferee was malicious and actively proved that the property rights could not be obtained in good faith. In the end, the court ruled that the property rights involved in the lawsuit were the plaintiff Wang, and the house was recovered.

7. Administrative litigation

1. The plaintiff Yue and the defendant Tianjin Vehicle Management Office administrative licensing administrative dispute, the defendant vehicle management office forcibly canceled the plaintiff's legal number plate, in the case of the implementation of small passenger car regulation in the city, the plaintiff could not produce updated indicators, the lawyer represented the plaintiff, advocated The defendant’s vehicle management office cancelled the plaintiff’s license plate and the defendant’s vehicle management agency resumed the plaintiff’s license plate.

2. The plaintiff's auto transport team and the defendant Tianjin Beichen District Highway Administration detained the administrative seizure. The defendant illegally seized the plaintiff's vehicle. The lawyer represented the plaintiff and claimed that the defendant seized the vehicle and applied the wrong law. The court sentenced the defendant to return the vehicle.

3. The plaintiff Gao and the defendant Beijing Fangshan District Traffic Bureau administrative seizure dispute, the defendant intercepted the normal plaintiff vehicle and arrested it on the expressway, the lawyer represented the plaintiff to sue, and claimed that the defendant did not have the right to block the car and detain the car. In violation of the law, the defendant finally took the initiative to release the car and compensate the plaintiff for economic losses.

4. The plaintiff Wang and the defendant Ningjin County Urban Management Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau of Shandong Province did not perform the statutory duty dispute. The defendant’s failure to perform the statutory duties caused the illegal construction behavior to continue to seriously affect the interests of the plaintiff’s residence. The lawyer represented the plaintiff and prosecuted, and the defendant’s defense has already been punished. Under the circumstances of the implementation, the lawyers claimed that the new illegal construction behaviors that had been punished and executed were not dealt with, and the illegal acts still existed. The court ruled that the defendants continued to perform their statutory duties and investigated and dealt with illegal construction.

5. The plaintiff Gao Mou, Gao Moumou and the defendant Tianjin Binhai New Area People's Government Gulin Sub-district Office did not perform the statutory duty dispute. The defendant had already performed the statutory duties on the grounds that the relevant documents for administrative punishment had been made for illegal construction. The lawyer represented the plaintiff and claimed the defendant. Due to the fact that the administrative enforcement measures were not taken in accordance with the law within a reasonable period of time after the relevant administrative penalty documents were issued, the illegal construction still exists. In the case of the first-instance judgment dismissing the lawsuit, the lawyers insisted on the efforts and the Tianjin Second Intermediate People’s Court The defendant was sentenced according to law and continued to perform his statutory duties.

6. The plaintiff Wang and the defendant Tianjin Economic and Technological Development Zone Human Resources and Social Security Bureau received industrial disputes for work-related injuries. The plaintiff Wang was recruited by a contractor who was illegally subcontracted by a company. The defendant refused to provide the labor relationship certificate. The plaintiff accepted the application for work injury identification, and the lawyer represented the plaintiff to sue. Finally, the court decided to revoke the decision on the inadmissibility of the defendant. The defendant accepted the application for the work injury identification of the plaintiff and made a decision on the work injury identification.

7. The plaintiff Sun Mou and the defendant Beijing Chaoyang District Human Resources and Social Security Bureau received an administrative dispute over the work injury. The defendant Sun Mou’s son was recruited by the individual who affixed the vehicle to a company. The defendant used the defendant’s proof that the plaintiff could not provide the labor relationship. The application for the plaintiff's work injury identification was rejected, and the lawyer represented the plaintiff. During the proceedings, the defendant took the initiative to accept the application for the work injury identification and made a work injury determination decision.

Eight, criminal defense

Liu intentionally injured the case, the lawyer actively defended, the court sentenced Li to probation


Return
Copyright 2018天津博专律师事务所 沪ICP备15050430号

attorneywon@outlook.com